dachary commented on issue peers/forgefed#111

I agree with you.

2 years ago

dachary commented on issue peers/forgefed#108

@fr33domlover does [this pull request](https://notabug.org/peers/forgefed/pulls/109/files) addresses your comment?

2 years ago

dachary created pull request peers/forgefed#109

2 years ago

dachary created new branch wip-vocabulary at dachary/forgefed

2 years ago

dachary closed issue peers/forgefed#106

2 years ago

dachary commented on issue peers/forgefed#106

This is resolved by https://notabug.org/peers/forgefed/pulls/108

2 years ago

dachary closed issue peers/forgefed#105

2 years ago

dachary commented on issue peers/forgefed#105

Closed via https://notabug.org/peers/forgefed/pulls/108

2 years ago

dachary commented on issue peers/forgefed#108

Updated to add `cloneUri` https://notabug.org/peers/forgefed/issues/105#issuecomment-31963

2 years ago

dachary commented on issue peers/forgefed#105

Yes and also commonly used in API, +1 on cloneUri.

2 years ago

dachary commented on issue peers/forgefed#105

> suggest property names for these URIs

2 years ago

dachary commented on issue peers/forgefed#105

Opened a pull request at https://notabug.org/peers/forgefed/pulls/108 to clarify the semantic of the Repository id.

2 years ago

dachary created pull request peers/forgefed#108

2 years ago

dachary commented on issue peers/forgefed#104

To be clear I'm not proposing that forgefed.org is the primary domain. Just that its ownership is transferred to the current maintainers of the forgefed project. They can then decide what to do with it, but it's a separate discussion.

2 years ago

dachary commented on issue peers/forgefed#105

So it would be ok for the receiver of the Repository message to assume that the id ( https://notabug.org/peers/forgefed.git for instance ) is suitable to use with the Git protocol and, for instance, run `git clone https://notabug.org/peers/forgefed.git`?

2 years ago

dachary opened issue peers/forgefed#107

2 years ago