123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107 |
- Economics assignment: APEC
- When the ‘Asian-Pacific Economic Cooperation” (APEC) was established in 1989 in response to the
- growing interdependence among Asia-Pacific economies, its goal was to advance Asia-Pacific economic
- dynamism and sense of community. When the cooperation was established, there were 12 founding
- member economies, namely Australia, Brunei Darussalam, Canada, Indonesia, Japan, Republic of Korea,
- Malaysia, New Zealand, Republic of the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and the United States. Since then
- there has been more countries/economies joining APEC. APEC has come a long way since 1989. It has
- built steadily on the efforts of the past and looks forward to further positive progress. The initial years of
- APEC were focused largely on exchange of views and project based initiatives. As needs of the member
- economies has evolved into a forum of higher purpose: to build the Asia-Pacific community through
- achieving economic growth and development through trade and economic cooperation. In the Osaka
- meeting in 1994, APEC leaders adopted the Osaka Action Agenda, which firmly established three pillars of
- APEC activities: Trade and investment liberalization, business facilitation and economic-technical
- cooperation. Its main objective is to develop a region-wide, free trade and investment regime by the year
- 2000. APEC operates by consensus. In 1991, members committed themselves to conducting their activities
- and work programs on the basis of open dialogue with equal respect for the views of all participants.
- The APEC chair, which rotates annually among members, is responsible for hosting the annual ministerial
- meeting of foreign and economic ministers. At the 1989 Canberra Ministerial Meeting, it was agreed that it
- would be appropriate that every alternative ministerial meeting be held in an ASEAN economy/country.
- Senior Official Meeting (SOM) are held regularly prior to every ministerial meeting. APEC senior officials
- make recommendations to the ministers and carry out their decisions. They oversee and coordinate, with
- approval from Ministers, the budgets and work programs of the APEC for a.
- Mr. Fischer, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Trade, said Australia’s IAP (Individual Action Plan)
- would address the main trade liberalization issues of tariffs, non- tariffs, investment and services, although
- the 1996 IAP would not pre-judge the outcomes of the existing and previously announced reviews into the
- passenger motor vehicle, textile clothing and footwear and sugar sectors. Other elements of the IAP deal
- wit the important trade facilitation issues such as standards and customs procedures, intellectual property
- rights, competition policy, and mobility of business people and deregulation.
- “Australia’s plan is fully consistent with the general principals of the Osaka Action Agenda agreed by that
- leaders in November 1995, including comprehensives,” Mr. Fischer said. “Australia’s done a great deal to
- liberalize our market consistent with APEC goals, and we expect others to match our record. The
- government will pursue vigorously Australian trade and investment priorities within APEC,” Mr. Fischer
- stated.
- Australia’s IAP address the objectives and guidelines of the Osaka Action Plan in a comprehensive manner:
- Tariffs
- Australia’s IAP includes reduction in applied tariffs to the year 2000.
- Table: Tariff Reductions in the APEC region
- Simple Average Applied Tariff
- 1988 1993 1997
- Australia * 15.6 7.0 5.3
- Brunei 3.9 3.9 2.0
- Canada (*) 3.7 2.4 1.3^
- Chile 19.9 11 11
- China 39.5 37.5 17
- Hong Kong 0 0 0
- Indonesia 18.1 17 11.7
- Japan * 4.3 3.4 4.6
- Korea 19.2 11.6 7.9^
- Malaysia 13.6 12.8 7.8^
- Mexico * 10.5 12.6 9.8^
- New Zealand 14.9 8.5 5.2
- PNG NA NA 23^
- Philippines 27.9 23.5 12.1
- Singapore 0.3 0.4 0
- Chinese Taipei 12.6 8.9 8.6
- Thailand 31.2 37.8 17
- United States (*) 4.2 4.2 3.4^
- Note: Does not include calculation of non-ad valorum tariffs
-  Indicates trade-weighted advantage
-  ^1996 data
- Source: http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/cib/1998-99/c99cib05.htm
- Australia’s applied simple tariff has fallen from 15.6% in 1998 to 6.1% in 1996 and will reduce further to
- 4.5% by the year 2000. Australia is also hoping to have tariffs reduced to zero in numerous sectors of our
- economy by the year 2000.
- Sectors Selected for Early Voluntary Sectoral Liberalism
- Sector EVSL Proposal
- Toys Progressive reduction to zero of tariffs on toys, preferably by 2000. Elimination of unjustified non-tariff barriers. Economic and technical cooperation
- Gems and jewelry Elimination of trade-restrictive measures on these products (phased out by 2005), which include pearls, diamonds, silver, gold, platinum, jewelry, goldsmiths’ and silversmiths’ wares.
- Environmental Goods and Services Elimination of tariffs by 2003 on environmental goods and liberalization of environmental services. Work on non-tariffs barriers. Economic and technical cooperation.
- Food Further impetus to trade facilitation work on food. Studies on market prospects on sugar, processed food. Tariff liberalization by 2004 for fruit and vegetables, processed food and beverages.
- Energy Removal of tariffs on coal, gas, electricity, and energy related equipment by 2004. Work on non-tariff measures, services, government procurement, and facilitation.
- Fish/fish products Elimination of tariffs by the end of 2005. Elimination of non-tariff measures. Work on subsides, sanity and phytosantitary measures.
- Forest products Elimination of tariffs on paper and wood products by 2000 and 2002 respectively. Work on non-tariff measures. Detailed provisions applying to building codes.
- Oilseeds/oilseed Products Elimination of all tariffs, non-tariff barriers, exports subsidies, quotas and other trade-distorting measures by 2002.
- Chemicals Tariff harmonization by 2001/2004 inline with the Chemicals Tariff Harmonization Agreement and eventual elimination of tariffs.
- Telecommunications Development of Mutual Arrangement. Aims to allow parties to test and certify equipment to an importing economy’s mandatory technical requirements.
- Rubber Reduction/elimination of tariff and phasing out of unjustifiable non-tariff measures.
- Fertilizers Elimination of tariffs by 2002/2004. Work on non-tariff measures.
- Automotive Products Private-public sector automotive dialogue. Harmonization of standards. Work on customs issues. Identify barriers to trade and investment.
- Medical Equipment Tariffs on medical equipment and instruments to be eliminated by 2001. Work on non-tariff measures.
- Civil Aircraft Elimination on tariffs on civil aircraft and related equipment by 200 and 2002 respectively. Trade facilitation.
- Source: http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/cib/1998-99/99cib05.htm
- Non-Tariff Measures
- Australia will abolish export controls and certain mineral products (coal, mineral sand liquefied natural gas,
- bauxite and aluminum).
- Services
- Australia is committed to further liberalize the business services, communication, transport, financial
- services and energy sectors including to:
- Telecommunications: Introduce full and open competition from 1 July and privatize 1/3 of
- Telstra with 35% of the float available to foreign investors.
- Transport: Windback maratime cabotage protection by year 2000 and discontinue schemes which
- provide financial incentives for certain Australian vessels. In aviation, Australia will progressively
- liberalize access to the market for freight and passengers and ensure airlines are free to set fares in
- response to market conditions.
- There are many other IAP’s in Australia’s list, however these were some of the main IAP’s.
- Why is APEC important? APEC is taking on strategic significance internationally for a number of reasons:
-  It acts as a forum between Asia and the Americans. The 18 countries of PAEC represent 56% of the world’s gross national product and 46% of all trade. Historically, contention between Japan and the United States over Asia cumulated in the outbreak of the Second World War in the pacific.
-  APEC is gaining momentum as one of the world’s centers for trade and liberalization discussions.
-  All three Chinas (Taiwan, Hong Kong and the people’s republic) are participants in APEC. The reversion of Hong Kong to China in 1997 is a historic change, which brought regional stability within APEC.
-  Asian immigration to Canada has been increasing in recent years. The growing population of Asian descent in Canada, particularly in Vancouver, means heightened awareness and interest in Asian-Pacific affairs.
- The international called APEC is a great force in today’s business. It is a thriving force, which will be
- around for many years to come. The effectiveness of this organization is extremely great, as it will benefit
- many people throughout the world, in all areas of business.
- <br><br>
- Words: 1279
|