emt68.txt 2.6 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546
  1. Rev. John Hale vs. John Proctor
  2. The characters of John Hale and John Proctor in “The Crucible”
  3. can be compared and contrasted according to their key traits, goals, and
  4. tendencies to change. These characters are probably the two most
  5. important characters in the play. They both are strong men mentally and
  6. are proud of what they accomplish.
  7. Reverend John Hale and John Proctor can be compared and
  8. contrasted according to their key traits. Reverend Hale is a man in his
  9. late forties. He is intelligent and very proud. He believes that he earned
  10. his titled as Reverend, the title was not only given to him. John Proctor is
  11. a man in his mid-thirties and like Reverend Hale he is proud of what he
  12. does. Proctor is also a man who is physically strong since he is always
  13. working on his farm. He is a person who does not like hypocrites or
  14. frauds. He is also stubborn and not easily led into things. People respect
  15. him and fear him as well.
  16. These two characters can also be compared according to their
  17. goals. Reverend Hale’s goal is to save the citizens of Salem from being
  18. condemned to death and of being accused of witchcraft. If someone is
  19. accused, Reverend Hale wants to get that person freed and prevent them
  20. from an unnecessary death. John Proctor’s goal is to first get his wife
  21. freed from jail after being accused of witchcraft. He also wants to get
  22. Valentin Benitez
  23. himself free and wants Hathorne and Danforth to see that there are no
  24. witches in Salem and that all the deaths that they have created are
  25. unreasonable and irrelevant.
  26. They can be further compared and contrasted by their tendencies
  27. to change. Reverend Hale usually is a straight faced, stubborn man who
  28. stands for what he believes in. At the end of the play he cries as John
  29. Proctor is taken off to be hanged before the whole village. John Proctor
  30. was also a stubborn man that did not deny what he believed, but at key
  31. times in the play he changed what he was saying and fighting for against
  32. the court. He first said he did not practice witchcraft and had never seen
  33. the Devil, but afterwards he said the opposite. He said that he was an
  34. evil person and that he did practice evil acts. In Act Two he also went
  35. from saying that he was a good man to finally confessing to being an
  36. adulterer and a lecher.
  37. The more appealing character was John Proctor because through
  38. his stubbornness and inflexibility he was a more interesting character.
  39. Proctor was a spontaneous character at times also when he changed his
  40. arguments into confessions.
  41. <br><br><b>Bibliography</b><br><br>
  42. n/a
  43. <br><br>
  44. Words: 449