123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260 |
- Description of the "concap" encapsulation protocol interface
- ============================================================
- The "concap" interface is intended to be used by network device
- drivers that need to process an encapsulation protocol.
- It is assumed that the protocol interacts with a linux network device by
- - data transmission
- - connection control (establish, release)
- Thus, the mnemonic: "CONnection CONtrolling eNCAPsulation Protocol".
- This is currently only used inside the isdn subsystem. But it might
- also be useful to other kinds of network devices. Thus, if you want
- to suggest changes that improve usability or performance of the
- interface, please let me know. I'm willing to include them in future
- releases (even if I needed to adapt the current isdn code to the
- changed interface).
- Why is this useful?
- ===================
- The encapsulation protocol used on top of WAN connections or permanent
- point-to-point links are frequently chosen upon bilateral agreement.
- Thus, a device driver for a certain type of hardware must support
- several different encapsulation protocols at once.
- The isdn device driver did already support several different
- encapsulation protocols. The encapsulation protocol is configured by a
- user space utility (isdnctrl). The isdn network interface code then
- uses several case statements which select appropriate actions
- depending on the currently configured encapsulation protocol.
- In contrast, LAN network interfaces always used a single encapsulation
- protocol which is unique to the hardware type of the interface. The LAN
- encapsulation is usually done by just sticking a header on the data. Thus,
- traditional linux network device drivers used to process the
- encapsulation protocol directly (usually by just providing a hard_header()
- method in the device structure) using some hardware type specific support
- functions. This is simple, direct and efficient. But it doesn't fit all
- the requirements for complex WAN encapsulations.
- The configurability of the encapsulation protocol to be used
- makes isdn network interfaces more flexible, but also much more
- complex than traditional lan network interfaces.
- Many Encapsulation protocols used on top of WAN connections will not just
- stick a header on the data. They also might need to set up or release
- the WAN connection. They also might want to send other data for their
- private purpose over the wire, e.g. ppp does a lot of link level
- negotiation before the first piece of user data can be transmitted.
- Such encapsulation protocols for WAN devices are typically more complex
- than encapsulation protocols for lan devices. Thus, network interface
- code for typical WAN devices also tends to be more complex.
- In order to support Linux' x25 PLP implementation on top of
- isdn network interfaces I could have introduced yet another branch to
- the various case statements inside drivers/isdn/isdn_net.c.
- This eventually made isdn_net.c even more complex. In addition, it made
- isdn_net.c harder to maintain. Thus, by identifying an abstract
- interface between the network interface code and the encapsulation
- protocol, complexity could be reduced and maintainability could be
- increased.
- Likewise, a similar encapsulation protocol will frequently be needed by
- several different interfaces of even different hardware type, e.g. the
- synchronous ppp implementation used by the isdn driver and the
- asynchronous ppp implementation used by the ppp driver have a lot of
- similar code in them. By cleanly separating the encapsulation protocol
- from the hardware specific interface stuff such code could be shared
- better in future.
- When operating over dial-up-connections (e.g. telephone lines via modem,
- non-permanent virtual circuits of wide area networks, ISDN) many
- encapsulation protocols will need to control the connection. Therefore,
- some basic connection control primitives are supported. The type and
- semantics of the connection (i.e the ISO layer where connection service
- is provided) is outside our scope and might be different depending on
- the encapsulation protocol used, e.g. for a ppp module using our service
- on top of a modem connection a connect_request will result in dialing
- a (somewhere else configured) remote phone number. For an X25-interface
- module (LAPB semantics, as defined in Documentation/networking/x25-iface.txt)
- a connect_request will ask for establishing a reliable lapb
- datalink connection.
- The encapsulation protocol currently provides the following
- service primitives to the network device.
- - create a new encapsulation protocol instance
- - delete encapsulation protocol instance and free all its resources
- - initialize (open) the encapsulation protocol instance for use.
- - deactivate (close) an encapsulation protocol instance.
- - process (xmit) data handed down by upper protocol layer
- - receive data from lower (hardware) layer
- - process connect indication from lower (hardware) layer
- - process disconnect indication from lower (hardware) layer
- The network interface driver accesses those primitives via callbacks
- provided by the encapsulation protocol instance within a
- struct concap_proto_ops.
- struct concap_proto_ops{
- /* create a new encapsulation protocol instance of same type */
- struct concap_proto * (*proto_new) (void);
- /* delete encapsulation protocol instance and free all its resources.
- cprot may no longer be referenced after calling this */
- void (*proto_del)(struct concap_proto *cprot);
- /* initialize the protocol's data. To be called at interface startup
- or when the device driver resets the interface. All services of the
- encapsulation protocol may be used after this*/
- int (*restart)(struct concap_proto *cprot,
- struct net_device *ndev,
- struct concap_device_ops *dops);
- /* deactivate an encapsulation protocol instance. The encapsulation
- protocol may not call any *dops methods after this. */
- int (*close)(struct concap_proto *cprot);
- /* process a frame handed down to us by upper layer */
- int (*encap_and_xmit)(struct concap_proto *cprot, struct sk_buff *skb);
- /* to be called for each data entity received from lower layer*/
- int (*data_ind)(struct concap_proto *cprot, struct sk_buff *skb);
- /* to be called when a connection was set up/down.
- Protocols that don't process these primitives might fill in
- dummy methods here */
- int (*connect_ind)(struct concap_proto *cprot);
- int (*disconn_ind)(struct concap_proto *cprot);
- };
- The data structures are defined in the header file include/linux/concap.h.
- A Network interface using encapsulation protocols must also provide
- some service primitives to the encapsulation protocol:
- - request data being submitted by lower layer (device hardware)
- - request a connection being set up by lower layer
- - request a connection being released by lower layer
- The encapsulation protocol accesses those primitives via callbacks
- provided by the network interface within a struct concap_device_ops.
- struct concap_device_ops{
- /* to request data be submitted by device */
- int (*data_req)(struct concap_proto *, struct sk_buff *);
- /* Control methods must be set to NULL by devices which do not
- support connection control. */
- /* to request a connection be set up */
- int (*connect_req)(struct concap_proto *);
- /* to request a connection be released */
- int (*disconn_req)(struct concap_proto *);
- };
- The network interface does not explicitly provide a receive service
- because the encapsulation protocol directly calls netif_rx().
- An encapsulation protocol itself is actually the
- struct concap_proto{
- struct net_device *net_dev; /* net device using our service */
- struct concap_device_ops *dops; /* callbacks provided by device */
- struct concap_proto_ops *pops; /* callbacks provided by us */
- int flags;
- void *proto_data; /* protocol specific private data, to
- be accessed via *pops methods only*/
- /*
- :
- whatever
- :
- */
- };
- Most of this is filled in when the device requests the protocol to
- be reset (opend). The network interface must provide the net_dev and
- dops pointers. Other concap_proto members should be considered private
- data that are only accessed by the pops callback functions. Likewise,
- a concap proto should access the network device's private data
- only by means of the callbacks referred to by the dops pointer.
- A possible extended device structure which uses the connection controlling
- encapsulation services could look like this:
- struct concap_device{
- struct net_device net_dev;
- struct my_priv /* device->local stuff */
- /* the my_priv struct might contain a
- struct concap_device_ops *dops;
- to provide the device specific callbacks
- */
- struct concap_proto *cprot; /* callbacks provided by protocol */
- };
- Misc Thoughts
- =============
- The concept of the concap proto might help to reuse protocol code and
- reduce the complexity of certain network interface implementations.
- The trade off is that it introduces yet another procedure call layer
- when processing the protocol. This has of course some impact on
- performance. However, typically the concap interface will be used by
- devices attached to slow lines (like telephone, isdn, leased synchronous
- lines). For such slow lines, the overhead is probably negligible.
- This might no longer hold for certain high speed WAN links (like
- ATM).
- If general linux network interfaces explicitly supported concap
- protocols (e.g. by a member struct concap_proto* in struct net_device)
- then the interface of the service function could be changed
- by passing a pointer of type (struct net_device*) instead of
- type (struct concap_proto*). Doing so would make many of the service
- functions compatible to network device support functions.
- e.g. instead of the concap protocol's service function
- int (*encap_and_xmit)(struct concap_proto *cprot, struct sk_buff *skb);
- we could have
- int (*encap_and_xmit)(struct net_device *ndev, struct sk_buff *skb);
- As this is compatible to the dev->hard_start_xmit() method, the device
- driver could directly register the concap protocol's encap_and_xmit()
- function as its hard_start_xmit() method. This would eliminate one
- procedure call layer.
- The device's data request function could also be defined as
-
- int (*data_req)(struct net_device *ndev, struct sk_buff *skb);
- This might even allow for some protocol stacking. And the network
- interface might even register the same data_req() function directly
- as its hard_start_xmit() method when a zero layer encapsulation
- protocol is configured. Thus, eliminating the performance penalty
- of the concap interface when a trivial concap protocol is used.
- Nevertheless, the device remains able to support encapsulation
- protocol configuration.
|