stable_kernel_rules.txt 4.6 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899
  1. Everything you ever wanted to know about Linux -stable releases.
  2. Rules on what kind of patches are accepted, and which ones are not, into the
  3. "-stable" tree:
  4. - It must be obviously correct and tested.
  5. - It cannot be bigger than 100 lines, with context.
  6. - It must fix only one thing.
  7. - It must fix a real bug that bothers people (not a, "This could be a
  8. problem..." type thing).
  9. - It must fix a problem that causes a build error (but not for things
  10. marked CONFIG_BROKEN), an oops, a hang, data corruption, a real
  11. security issue, or some "oh, that's not good" issue. In short, something
  12. critical.
  13. - Serious issues as reported by a user of a distribution kernel may also
  14. be considered if they fix a notable performance or interactivity issue.
  15. As these fixes are not as obvious and have a higher risk of a subtle
  16. regression they should only be submitted by a distribution kernel
  17. maintainer and include an addendum linking to a bugzilla entry if it
  18. exists and additional information on the user-visible impact.
  19. - New device IDs and quirks are also accepted.
  20. - No "theoretical race condition" issues, unless an explanation of how the
  21. race can be exploited is also provided.
  22. - It cannot contain any "trivial" fixes in it (spelling changes,
  23. whitespace cleanups, etc).
  24. - It must follow the Documentation/SubmittingPatches rules.
  25. - It or an equivalent fix must already exist in Linus' tree (upstream).
  26. Procedure for submitting patches to the -stable tree:
  27. - If the patch covers files in net/ or drivers/net please follow netdev stable
  28. submission guidelines as described in
  29. Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt
  30. - Send the patch, after verifying that it follows the above rules, to
  31. stable@vger.kernel.org. You must note the upstream commit ID in the
  32. changelog of your submission, as well as the kernel version you wish
  33. it to be applied to.
  34. - To have the patch automatically included in the stable tree, add the tag
  35. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
  36. in the sign-off area. Once the patch is merged it will be applied to
  37. the stable tree without anything else needing to be done by the author
  38. or subsystem maintainer.
  39. - If the patch requires other patches as prerequisites which can be
  40. cherry-picked than this can be specified in the following format in
  41. the sign-off area:
  42. Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.3.x: a1f84a3: sched: Check for idle
  43. Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.3.x: 1b9508f: sched: Rate-limit newidle
  44. Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.3.x: fd21073: sched: Fix affinity logic
  45. Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.3.x
  46. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
  47. The tag sequence has the meaning of:
  48. git cherry-pick a1f84a3
  49. git cherry-pick 1b9508f
  50. git cherry-pick fd21073
  51. git cherry-pick <this commit>
  52. - The sender will receive an ACK when the patch has been accepted into the
  53. queue, or a NAK if the patch is rejected. This response might take a few
  54. days, according to the developer's schedules.
  55. - If accepted, the patch will be added to the -stable queue, for review by
  56. other developers and by the relevant subsystem maintainer.
  57. - Security patches should not be sent to this alias, but instead to the
  58. documented security@kernel.org address.
  59. Review cycle:
  60. - When the -stable maintainers decide for a review cycle, the patches will be
  61. sent to the review committee, and the maintainer of the affected area of
  62. the patch (unless the submitter is the maintainer of the area) and CC: to
  63. the linux-kernel mailing list.
  64. - The review committee has 48 hours in which to ACK or NAK the patch.
  65. - If the patch is rejected by a member of the committee, or linux-kernel
  66. members object to the patch, bringing up issues that the maintainers and
  67. members did not realize, the patch will be dropped from the queue.
  68. - At the end of the review cycle, the ACKed patches will be added to the
  69. latest -stable release, and a new -stable release will happen.
  70. - Security patches will be accepted into the -stable tree directly from the
  71. security kernel team, and not go through the normal review cycle.
  72. Contact the kernel security team for more details on this procedure.
  73. Trees:
  74. - The queues of patches, for both completed versions and in progress
  75. versions can be found at:
  76. http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git
  77. - The finalized and tagged releases of all stable kernels can be found
  78. in separate branches per version at:
  79. http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git
  80. Review committee:
  81. - This is made up of a number of kernel developers who have volunteered for
  82. this task, and a few that haven't.