12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667686970717273 |
- public:
- // note .. maybe this can be attached to another node structure?
- // depends which works best for cache.
- struct ItemPairs {
- struct Link {
- void set(BVHHandle h, void *ud) {
- handle = h;
- userdata = ud;
- }
- BVHHandle handle;
- void *userdata;
- };
- void clear() {
- num_pairs = 0;
- extended_pairs.reset();
- expanded_aabb = BOUNDS();
- }
- BOUNDS expanded_aabb;
- // maybe we can just use the number in the vector TODO
- int32_t num_pairs;
- LocalVector<Link> extended_pairs;
- void add_pair_to(BVHHandle h, void *p_userdata) {
- Link temp;
- temp.set(h, p_userdata);
- extended_pairs.push_back(temp);
- num_pairs++;
- }
- uint32_t find_pair_to(BVHHandle h) const {
- for (int n = 0; n < num_pairs; n++) {
- if (extended_pairs[n].handle == h) {
- return n;
- }
- }
- return -1;
- }
- bool contains_pair_to(BVHHandle h) const {
- return find_pair_to(h) != BVHCommon::INVALID;
- }
- // return success
- void *remove_pair_to(BVHHandle h) {
- void *userdata = nullptr;
- for (int n = 0; n < num_pairs; n++) {
- if (extended_pairs[n].handle == h) {
- userdata = extended_pairs[n].userdata;
- extended_pairs.remove_at_unordered(n);
- num_pairs--;
- break;
- }
- }
- return userdata;
- }
- // experiment : scale the pairing expansion by the number of pairs.
- // when the number of pairs is high, the density is high and a lower collision margin is better.
- // when there are few local pairs, a larger margin is more optimal.
- real_t scale_expansion_margin(real_t p_margin) const {
- real_t x = real_t(num_pairs) * (1.0 / 9.0);
- x = MIN(x, 1.0);
- x = 1.0 - x;
- return p_margin * x;
- }
- };
|