Notes on maintaining the Neovim project.
In practice we haven't found a way to forecast more precisely than "next" and "after next". So there are usually one or two (at most) planned milestones:
The forecasting problem might be solved with an explicit priority system (like Bram's todo.txt). Meanwhile the Neovim priority system is defined by:
+plan
label increases the ticket's priority merely
for having a plan written down: it is closer to completion than tickets
without a plan.Anything that isn't in the next milestone, and doesn't have a finished PR—is just not something you care very much about, by construction. Post-release you can review open issues, but chances are your next milestone is already getting full... :)
Release "often", but not "early".
The (unreleased) master
branch is the "early" channel; it should not be
released if it's not stable. High-risk changes may be merged to master
if
the next release is not imminent.
For maintenance releases, create a release-x.y
branch. If the current release
has a major bug:
master
.release-x.y
.release-x.y
.
./scripts/release.sh
stable
tag.stable
tag.The neovim repository includes a backport github action.
In order to trigger the action, a PR must be labeled with a label matching the
form backport release-0.X
. If the label is applied before the PR is merged,
the backport will be filed automatically against the target branch. Otherwise,
comment \backport
on the merged PR after the label has been applied to trigger
a backport. Note, the PR must have a description in the issue body, or the backport
will fail.
These "bundled" dependencies can be updated by bumping their versions in third-party/CMakeLists.txt
:
These dependencies are "vendored" (inlined), we need to update the sources manually:
We also maintain some forks, particularly for Windows, if we are waiting on upstream changes: https://github.com/neovim/neovim/wiki/Deps